Using chip minimum has had a more significant impact on player behavior.
As mentioned above, this doesn’t happen in the lower Roulette tiers. So what’s the difference? The goal of increasing the table minimum should result in a change in player behavior, specifically, in placing a total higher wager. The rest of the world uses chip minimum for their pricing strategy. The US predominantly uses the table minimum strategy, while Canada is split between the two. There are two pricing strategies for Roulette: chip minimum or table minimum.
It’s also the same experience for the customer, slow game and not as fun, which doesn’t help the house out from a revenue perspective. Busier games that have a lot of stacked chips, typically games with a $25+ table minimum, can also run slower for the dealer and have a higher chance for errors. The process of using color non-value cheques in Roulette can be quite slow, depending on occupancy levels and players' betting preferences. And if the purpose of changing prices is to yield the tables in order to achieve an ideal occupancy to enhance your revenue, that might not be accomplished if there is no change for the players.Īnother challenge in Roulette is the game pace. Their placed wagers remain the same between these tiers. When prices are raised or lowered between the $5-$15 table minimum tiers, player behavior barely changes. The above chart shows a fairly common scenario in North America.
